Quantcast The Traveler
College Media Network

The Traveler

  • Front Page

Letters to the editor

Issue date: 10/27/08 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Congressman either is scared or wasteful

Our Republican Congressman John Boozman appears to be worried he may lose this election. Despite multiple newspapers writing off Green Party campaigns for lower levels of fundraising, it appears Boozman may be worried. ? ?

You may ask: what is your empirical evidence for this claim? According to the public record at OpenSecrets.org, Boozman has spent more than $230,000 during this campaign so far. 

Given this spending, he either is taking our opposition seriously or is liberally wasting a mountain of donor money. How can Boozman justify spending $230,000 when his opponent will spend a mere $6,000? 

The answer may be that I am speaking truth to power very loudly, and people may be listening. We are small in funding and corruption, but giant in terms of ideas. 

Fortunately, Boozman also faces an especially bad year for Bush Republicans like himself, who are greatly at fault for our economic crises. 

Additionally, he voted for the unpopular $850 billion Wall Street bailout, which is not going to soundly address the deeper Main Street economic problems of recession, foreclosure crises, rising unemployment, rising health care costs and rising energy prices.  ??

If that $850 billion were spent for a Main Street bailout, many of these deeper problems could have been solved. 

These problems are interrelated and could all be comprehensively addressed with single-payer universal health care, a freeze and renegotiation of foreclosures, and powerful investment in clean energy infrastructure to create millions of jobs.  ??

This $850 billion could have provided unprecedented funding to state and local governments for transportation and water projects. 

It also could have provided extremely meaningful economic incentives for homeowners and the clean energy business sectors to address the economic national security threat posed by climate change, as well as our dangerous dependence on oil dictatorships in the unstable Middle East.

Abel Tomlinson
Graduate student
Green Party candidate for U.S. Congress



Not content to license constitutional rights


The Arkansas Traveler is sure quick on the draw to oppose efforts to restore open carry rights in Arkansas as well as to insist that gun carry rights be limited to only those "with the proper license."

After all, in most states, no license is needed to open carry holstered handguns at age 18. But in Arkansas, open carry is banned entirely.

Over the years, the U.S. Supreme Court has said that the First Amendment does not allow states to require a "proper license" to publish a newspaper.

If gun owners must be licensed to carry a gun, shouldn't newspapers be licensed, too?

Mike Stollenwerk
Alexandria, Va.
Co-founder of OpenCarry.org



They broke out into song


Flag on the play: very offensive referee interference. Penalties offset. Arkansas: 24. Mississippi: 23.

And they broke out into song.

Jeremy Carrell
Maintenance Worker II
Recycling

Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Related Links

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

How many times have you used Safe Ride?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement